Novo Cane [!] ? !
Neo-wordology ? / (sic) /
the last slash: A. 4M
2 $M, B. The
Real B. S. of the F. C. , C. Better
Business Bureau
(sic): em[!] \ A. , B. Mitt's
BO*Son, C. Para-model
, D. Association
is Not Free! (OW)
Showing posts with label No Labels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label No Labels. Show all posts
Thursday, October 02, 2014
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Saturday, November 23, 2013
ether note
Labelism*
A.
B.
C.
D-homericization.
{^} Weak Ends with Alex Witt: Nuclear Fallout^ / do it now ? Cave to Republicans, no compromise. No Filibuster.
* inspiration V. conspiration
[endless v. priceless**]
[4mRunes; Mach, Mach., Maz...low ! ? ]
** post-4mR... ^*^ You are under a spell you think I suffer. There may be some issue with the method... of counting ... because ... before ....bring... up for votes. The court ... you call it is actually court ... as they had no problem with previous ... and it is funny to think ...district*** would not be busy enough ^*^ (Re-clipsis). D'Ribble Re-quilting.
A.
B.
C.
D-homericization.
{^} Weak Ends with Alex Witt: Nuclear Fallout^ / do it now ? Cave to Republicans, no compromise. No Filibuster.
* inspiration V. conspiration
[endless v. priceless**]
[4mRunes; Mach, Mach., Maz...low ! ? ]
** post-4mR... ^*^ You are under a spell you think I suffer. There may be some issue with the method... of counting ... because ... before ....bring... up for votes. The court ... you call it is actually court ... as they had no problem with previous ... and it is funny to think ...district*** would not be busy enough ^*^ (Re-clipsis). D'Ribble Re-quilting.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Curve Balls?
Pardon My Hume or Ism.
Hume: David*Ism: humor**
Not that everything(^^) is Pythagorean or Platonic***.
*Off the Cuff
** the trouble
*** (see * under David)
(b.s.)Hume: A., B., C., not D nor E.
(b.s.)Goliath, A. B.
(FP!) (FP1) (FP2)
[Out of^ the park? Chuck Todd pitches an interesting questions! Press Conference^ ? Note: 2nd link ^not reflecting^ complete / answer. Follow up with MB.^^^]
(^^)
^^^ to be updated A. B.
[ 3-21-13 To file. x, y, z To be clear, it was after the Hume or Ism that the President hit it out of the park, but I have yet to locate his complete answer, to Chuck Todd in Israel.]
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Brackets and the Debt Clock
[9-26-11 UPDATE: Tax Plan and "Fiscal Terrorism" A slight rearrangement and edit for clarity below. ]
[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]
The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.
The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.
Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.
Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.
But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.
[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]
*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself
[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!
[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]
[In might be easier if the links and asterisks are referenced later.***]
The whole issue of cuts over revenues * _ must be sorted out on two fronts. There is the issue of the so-called "progressive" tax code. Then there is the issue of the history of the tax code(see* pun), and how it impacts the debt clock.
The first regards the "Buffet Rule". There are the actual tax bracket rates(10% to 35%), and then there is the effective tax rate, which is further complicated(reduced) by captial gains tax rates(15%). Let us also be reminded that even the richest pay the same rates for their first brackets worth of income,(ZERO), let alone each bracket's worth of income. But since the capital gains tax is most of the income of the bulk of the rich, the effective tax rate will not be the actual sum of each bracket's worth. I will not bother to do some math here, but I hope it is clear. Basically the effective tax rate for the rich are not effective as "progressive" by a look at their brackets. They effectively get a lower tax rate, because capital gains are taxed less than the middle to top income brackets.
Second, there is the matter of the "Debt Clock", which should have its own brackets of sorts. The Bush wars, as well as his Medicare(fix), not to mention his tax cuts are off the clock so-to-speak. Not to mention the economic down turn which should probably reset the clock. If I was able to clarify the first issue, I don't mean to make up for it by complicating the second. But the "spending under borrowing" is more than a pun, it is an economic effect. For now I just mean to address the clock issue. Where I imagine that there could be some way to show previous administration's as well as the current administration's** debt clocks.
Now, I hope that I can get away with not providing more detail. But it is not so simple, as I almost closed the issue. It would not be simply an historical replay of their debt clocks, but a sorting of the debt from their budgets. So we would have several clocks at different brackets in time. This is the matter, where the devil is in the details. This almost becomes a matter for mathematical physicists in regard to the dynamics of budgets and time, in that each bracket in time has potential future impact where political economists would sit in for the mathematical physicists.
But, I hope that it can be imagined that each bracket in time, have two clocks. Their own budget and the debt that was not theirs. I will leave it for real economists or accountants to sort out whether there needs to be more than two, as I don't know if it is just my imagination, or the reality of the difficulty in sorting this out. In this regard, I mean the difficulty of sorting a budget's impact over time. But maybe it can be imagined from the effective impact that war and medicare can have on people and how dynamic that is over time, let alone the setting of tax rates. In fact, that is addressed by one or two instances alone. The Bush tax cuts were temporary. The Bush wars and the Medicare fix were not paid for.
[Please note that the links and image were inserted after completion of this blog post. They include, in order: The New York Times, FOX NEWS, No-Labels, and the Center for American Progress [9-26-11: OurFuture.org], where it was not my intent to lower the level of discourse nor bring more nuanced metaphor to light. But please note my No-Labels comment, in regard to the referees and what is on the table. Not to pun on a game buffet, but the neither the cuts sandwich nor the sand wedged in links were referenced for the writing of this post. But it may be suitable that brackets and clocks are used in games. This is a not so nuanced reference to the sports analogy of politics.]
*which alone needs some economic sorting: I mean "spending under borrowing", to pun a bit.
** oops, a whole new clock issue, why not bracket it by congresses?
*** not to mention by myself
[9-23-11 Update 'nuff s' Ed?] Iron Chef!
[9-29-11 update on timing, see comment 2. Speaking of timing,(darn) lost it for a moment.]
Friday, July 01, 2011
By George...
I think that President Obama has got it. No Goldilocks, but the middle road between Boehner and Whiner. While no hot dog or Bush the Unitary Executive, some on the right have said he can "get her done".
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Churned Media
Now that's the ticket!
"Earned Media" was the term that Sharon Angle malappropriated, but this is the punchline to my wave theory* of the mess age and the difficult dynamics of what is on the table.
* the squeaky wheel gets the oil, I mean media.
[Trump to Reality (Or Eye of The Tiger?)
Translation: Maybe I am looking for a silver lining, but is The Donald potentially the Nixon to China in all this dark matter.]
[Now what about Re-Birthers? By Jingo. Not to mention. And I am not talking Manchurian Candidate. SEGUE I think I had better take a double Sabbatical, for "business reasons" and for cleaning up this act.]
[Content, Con Tent, Content / C Labels]
"Earned Media" was the term that Sharon Angle malappropriated, but this is the punchline to my wave theory* of the mess age and the difficult dynamics of what is on the table.
* the squeaky wheel gets the oil, I mean media.
[Trump to Reality (Or Eye of The Tiger?)
Translation: Maybe I am looking for a silver lining, but is The Donald potentially the Nixon to China in all this dark matter.]
[Now what about Re-Birthers? By Jingo. Not to mention. And I am not talking Manchurian Candidate. SEGUE I think I had better take a double Sabbatical, for "business reasons" and for cleaning up this act.]
[Content, Con Tent, Content / C Labels]
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Today is a good day for...
...STEPHANIE MILLER.
Something about having to laugh or you'd (might) cry. I had a hunch this would start something, or end somewhere.
Speaking of Ribbles...
Multiple "Choice" Questions
The Fourth Law of Logic
Something to Ponder
Math is next to Ge Oh Me Try.
God is Good[*]with a missing Oh.
Actually this was a tangent from my original intent.(NOT) (or pond during)
But seriously(as if I am not): there were also three links from Stephanie Miller.(not to mention)
[* 3-11-11] today I note that at the time I was aware of the irony or maybe the need for a comma, or was it too vain an attempt, as an "o" really is needed to have the "oh", yet it revolves around "Something to Ponder".
Something about having to laugh or you'd (might) cry. I had a hunch this would start something, or end somewhere.
Speaking of Ribbles...
Multiple "Choice" Questions
The Fourth Law of Logic
Something to Ponder
Math is next to Ge Oh Me Try.
God is Good[*]with a missing Oh.
Actually this was a tangent from my original intent.(NOT) (or pond during)
But seriously(as if I am not): there were also three links from Stephanie Miller.(not to mention)
[* 3-11-11] today I note that at the time I was aware of the irony or maybe the need for a comma, or was it too vain an attempt, as an "o" really is needed to have the "oh", yet it revolves around "Something to Ponder".
Tuesday, February 01, 2011
Random Points
[POST 2-8-11]
Running from Labels?
Who knows what whom didn't?
Belly Up to the Table.
Trust(HBO) but verify.
Redistribution of Wealth
Redistribution of Yikes
Redistribution of Genre
Less than random thought: What is Sarah Palin running for?
November 2011: The New Adventures of Regis and the Old Larry King? Queen of Truth and Balance. A cornerstone: "We should not stand for that, or with that or by that." FYIS: For Your Information Sarah - here are for whom knows started it.
BTW: My language is the victim to the hood of refudiation here. i.e. close enough for government work?
[Note: bottom link will always indicate previous post]
Running from Labels?
Who knows what whom didn't?
Belly Up to the Table.
Trust(HBO) but verify.
Redistribution of Wealth
Redistribution of Yikes
Redistribution of Genre
Less than random thought: What is Sarah Palin running for?
November 2011: The New Adventures of Regis and the Old Larry King? Queen of Truth and Balance. A cornerstone: "We should not stand for that, or with that or by that." FYIS: For Your Information Sarah - here are for whom knows started it.
BTW: My language is the victim to the hood of refudiation here. i.e. close enough for government work?
[Note: bottom link will always indicate previous post]
Saturday, January 01, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)